Telf. 963 39 50 37 · formaciofla@uv.es

Blog de Cirugía e Implantología Oral

27 feb 2016

Guided implant surgery with modification of the technique involving the raising of a semicircular miniflap: A preliminar study

Peñarrocha MA, Viña JA, Maestre L, Peñarrocha D, Balaguer J. Guided implant surgery with modification of the technique involving the raising of a semicircular miniflap: A preliminary study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Sep 1;17 (5):e775-80.

Abstract
Objective: An evaluation is made of pain, swelling and peri-implant attached mucosal width after implant-based rehabilitation involving guided surgery and a modification of the technique with the raising of a semicircular miniflap, in single and partial replacements.
Study design: A case-control study was carried out. The study group consisted of 12 patients with the placement of 19 implants using a guided surgery and miniflap technique. The control group consisted of 12 patients with the placement of 22 implants using the conventional technique. Each patient scored postoperative swelling and pain by means of a visual analog scale (VAS). Attached vestibular mucosa width was evaluated 12 weeks after implant placement.
Results: Twelve operations were carried out in each group. Immediate aesthetics were established for all implants of the study group. One implant failed in each group. Maximum pain was recorded after 6 hours in both groups (mean VAS score 4 and 4.9 in the study and control group, respectively). Maximum swelling was recorded after 24 hours (mean VAS score 2.5) in the study group and on the second day (mean VAS score 3.4) in the control group. The mean attached vestibular mucosa width was 2.9 mm in the study group and 3.2 mm in the control group.

Conclusion: In this preliminary study, guided implant surgery with a semicircular miniflap in single and partial replacements resulted in slightly less postoperative pain and swelling than with the conventional implant technique. The attached vestibular mucosa width was greater in the control group, though the differences were very small.

Pubmed


PDF